Since there would not look like any "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can several of you deliver a place to begin with this mixture and matters to consider when working this Load up?
Needless to say, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different lot figures, but I do think I understand why. It's a litigation-pushed world, and a few idiot would undoubtedly deduce that he could combine H380 and H110 and come up with his own tailor made combination of powder. What a earth.
That you are suitable They are really a similar the SC is brief Slice so it meters better, I do not Assume you can obtain just standard 4831 any longer
Together with the 154 grain Hornady SP during the 280, H4831 gave me very good teams and superior velocity, but Rottweil R905 features a drastically better velocity and presents marginally much better precision. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos during the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally much better. As a result, in Each and every of those instances I went with An additional powder, but I would certainly detest to divest myself from the H4831.
Beginner to reloading. This will be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been ready to get my arms on a couple lbs . of h4831.
Apache Jct Very good information, I have jars of both equally and often puzzled if they might be reloaded Using the similar recipes must I operate out of one or the other.
Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the only authentic big difference would be that the shortcut meters much better by reloading tools. At the time It really is loaded theres no purposeful distinction. I have heard the shortcut can have a small little bit faster burn up amount but It appears insignificant.
The SC or SSC designated powders normally allow for higher load density, to help you ordinarily get a little bit far more powder within a provided case when applying compressed loads. Use of a fall tube can even more improve this edge.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to reap the benefits of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Severe powder.
You could have to produce a couple of a lot more posts to acquire cleared to do PM's. When you finally get to that standing I might article within the categorised reloading part to check out if any individual is in your area for just a trade. Click to grow...
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are fully distinct powders, with IMR 4831 getting substantially a lot quicker when compared to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't h4831 vs h4831sc handle them as exactly the same powder, since they most absolutely will not be.
I use fifty two grs H4831sc by using a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It is exact, gentle mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it was me, I might begin at fifty two gr and perform up.
Equally have the Similar burn fee, short Minimize is available in handy For anyone who is at max fill and not at force/velocity that you want you may h4831 vs h4831sc get more shortcut within a circumstance.
IMR4831 and H4831SC are various. Where by you will be complicated it and believing that it truly is close is H4831 and H4831SC are certainly equivalent. Those two are essentially the identical apart from H4831SC is manufactured to h4831sc load data smaller grains so it meters much easier.